This blog shadows my first blog
post, “Politics – It all comes down to
Politics!” – looking further into linguistics in secondary schooling. I
discuss the advantages and disadvantages of increasing the level of high school
students studying foreign languages.
On October 7th, 2012, The Age released the article – “French? Italian? It's all double Dutch to many”. The article features Clara Haberberger – a VCE linguistics student. The article delivers the value she finds in multilingualism, “Learning another language doesn't just mean you can communicate in another language - it means you are also absorbing another culture and learning to understand other people and where they are coming from.”[i] This can barely be argued – learning another language does benefit an individual in many aspects – it is not just acquisition of the language, but the culture and history that accompanies it; learning a second language also offers great cognitive development which is believed to aid in the acquisition of a third, fourth, etc. language.
Clara classes
Australians as having a monolingual mindset – “There seems to be the attitude that
once you've got English under control, why do another language? Because English
is the world language.” By this – she is raising a concern shared by the
Australian Education system – and its politicians. The Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals
for Young Australians updated its goals in 2008, with its new demands
stressing “the need to nurture an appreciation of and respect for social,
cultural and religious diversity, and a sense of global citizenship”, followed
by the need to become “Asia literate”, engaging and building strong
relationships with Asia (MCEECDYA 2008: 4).”[ii]
Hence a political push to introduce second languages into state schools is
underway.
I would like to think that this ‘monolingual
mindset’ is a result of Australia’s unique girt-by-sea-ness. It is
understandable that many European schools provide their students with a
secondary European language – and American schools teaching Spanish considering
the close relations with South America, but Australia is different: there are
no other countries physically boarding us.
This isn’t to suggest that we
should stay this way – of course we as Australians would benefit greatly from
picking up another language, but what language and at what price? Obviously a
lot of hours are required to develop another language – so how would it fit into
the 9am-3pm school day? This means classes will have to be cut short or have to be
replaced entirely.
In the article, Clara points to
the focus on science and mathematics as the reason why the languages have been
neglected. This assumption is on well grounds with Julia Gillard promising that
by 2020 “Australia should be among the leaders in reading, science and maths
and for providing high quality and high equity education” (presumably – the top 5)[iii]
So what will it be, government?
Will you choose the languages or the sciences? We know that after all your
decisions stream from the best interests of the economy – so what will take precedence
– they both offer great economical benefits!?
[ii] Christina Ho (2011). Respecting the Presence of
Others: School Micropublics and Everyday Multiculturalism, Journal of Intercultural Studies. Pg. 605
